Tödlicher Ziplineunfall Australien

Hier werden aktuelle oder alte Unfälle sowie Zwischenfälle analysiert

Tödlicher Ziplineunfall Australien

Beitragvon Walter » Mo Dez 09, 2019 11:45 pm

In Australien hat ein Ziplineseil versagt, 1 Person gestorben, eine zweite verletzt.
Es dürfte eine Pressverbindung gerutscht sein.

Fatal fall at tourist attraction
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Print
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to LinkedInShare to More

In October 2019, a patron died, and another was seriously injured while using a zipline attraction as part of a rainforest adventure tour.

Early enquiries indicate part of the zipline rope system has failed causing the two patrons to fall from a significant height.

Investigations are continuing.
Preventing a similar incident

The use of adventure activity equipment such as zip lines, rafts and high rope courses allows participants to experience a range of pursuits in the natural environment. Equipment used in providing these experiences is often constructed in different ways to suit the activity and the operational environment.

Risks associated with adventure activities are generally classified under:

People - risks may include participants who are physically or psychologically unprepared for an activity or have known behavioural issues that affect the safety of the activity.
Equipment - risks may include insufficient gear for the group or an inferior standard of equipment.
Environment - risks may include adverse or unseasonal weather, sudden changes in river levels, high winds or danger from local wildlife.

(Source: Queensland Adventure Activity Standards - Challenge Ropes Course – Queensland Government)

A person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) has duties under WHS legislation to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, but not limited to;

provision and maintenance of a work environment without risks to health and safety
provision and maintenance of safe plant and structures
provision and maintenance of safe systems of work.

Risk management must be completed and a safe system of work in place when managing the risks associated with adventure activities. Effective risk management starts with a commitment to health and safety from those who operate and manage the business or undertaking. Managing work health and safety risks is an ongoing process. Risk management involves four steps;

identify hazards – find out what could cause harm
assess risks – understand the possible harm, how serious it could be, and the likelihood of it happening
control risks – implement the most effective control measure that is reasonably practicable in the circumstances
review control measures to ensure they are working as planned.

You must always aim to eliminate a hazard causing the risk with something of lesser risk. If these controls are not reasonably practicable, you must minimise the risk by one or a combination of the following:

Engineering - only use equipment according to their design and are free from any defects. Any components or equipment associated with the zipline should be used, inspected and maintained according to the manufacturer’s specifications and instructions. In the absence of the manufacturer’s specifications and instructions, follow the instructions of a competent person.
Administrative controls - if risk remains, it must be minimised by implementing administrative controls, so far as is reasonably practicable. For example;
developing safe work procedures on zipline use while ensuring only authorised persons perform specific tasks
ensuring worker training, experience and competency is appropriate for the nature and complexity of their duties, and who are then able to inform participants
before commencing any maintenance work on ziplines, all components and equipment should be inspected by a competent or authorised person to determine if any wear, movement or alterations to the system have occurred.
Personal protective equipment - any remaining risk must be minimised with suitable personal protective equipment. For example;
provision of helmets, harnesses, gloves.

Additional guidance on the design, testing and inspection of zip line wire rope terminations will be provided in the soon to be published WHSQ guidance document Zip Line Terminations.


From July 2014 to November 2019, WHSQ was notified of 11 incidents of people sustaining an injury falling from a zipline or high-rope activity. WHSQ has issued four statutory notices across all industries relating to the risk management of such incidents.
Prosecutions and compliance

In 2019, a business was fined $40,000 after a participant was injured on a zipline tour. The participant was completing a run on the zipline when a component failed rendering the braking system inoperable. As a result, the participant was still traveling at speed nearing the end, colliding with a guide and a tree. The patron sustained serious injuries. An investigation found an inadequate inspection regime to identify hazards such as unacceptable wear in the reduction line existed. The business also failed to follow the manufacturer’s instructions on the use of the zipline ropes. These failures created the risk of unacceptable wear to line components.
More Information

How to manage work health and safety risks Code of Practice 2011(PDF, 1048.03 KB)
Work health and safety consultation, co-operation and co-ordination Code of Practice 2011(PDF, 486.2 KB)
Queensland Adventure Activity Standards Challenge Ropes Course

Support for people affected by a serious workplace incident

Have you been affected by a workplace fatality, illness or serious injury? For advice and support, visit our Facebook page or email ohs.coronialliaison@oir.qld.gov.au.

Last updated
04 December 2019
Walter Siebert
Beiträge: 398
Registriert: Fr Feb 08, 2008 3:05 pm
Wohnort: Wien

Re: Tödlicher Ziplineunfall Australien

Beitragvon Walter » Mo Dez 09, 2019 11:46 pm

https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/injury- ... on6.com.au[/url]
Zip line terminations
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Print
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to LinkedInShare to More

Issued: 6/11/2019
Last Updated: 6/11/2019

Contributing factors
Action required
Further information


The purpose of this safety alert is to inform zip line owners, operators, engineers and riggers of the risk of failure of zip line terminations and to provide guidance to help prevent the failure of zip lines.

A zip line consists of a steel wire rope that is suspended between two points, along which one or more people travel while suspended from trolleys. Zip lines are also known as flying foxes.

This safety alert provides information on zip line terminations and does not apply to other suspended rope applications.

In October 2019, an 86-metre zip line termination failed and two patrons dropped to the ground, causing fatal injuries to one and serious injuries to the other. The two patrons were travelling along the zip line, one behind the other, with a rope link between them.

Rope terminations on zip lines generally use either of two basic types of rope termination:

pressed ferrule or swage type rope terminations (refer Photograph 1)
wire rope grips (e.g. bulldog grips) (refer Photograph 2).

Both pressed ferrule terminations and wire rope grips rely on the application of pressure between two parallel sections of wire rope, the rope tail and the loaded section. The applied pressure creates frictional resistance to avoid failure of the termination by preventing relative movement.

Over time the wire rope characteristics may change (e.g. the rope diameter may reduce) so that a termination which previously withstood applied loads may suddenly slip and cause failure of the zip line.

Visual inspection of rope terminations may not be adequate on its own as a means for verifying the ongoing adequacy of terminations.

The rope tension in zip lines can be extremely high and includes:

pre-tension applied to the rope during set up (to reduce sag, i.e. ‘catenary’)
tree movement
the additional loads applied by patrons using the zip line.

It is important to note that loads applied by patrons to the zip line and its end anchorages will be many times their self-weight due to the triangulation effect of the load. For example if a 100 kg patron uses a zip line, the additional tension applied to the zip line and its anchorages could be more than five times greater (i.e. potentially in excess of 500 kg force).
Zip line photo 1
Photograph 1: Pressed swage type rope termination (example only) Zip line photo 2
Photograph 2: Rope termination using wire rope grips bulldog type (example only)
Contributing factors

The incident is being investigated. It appears that the rope grip type termination at the top end of the zip line failed, allowing the zip line to disengage suddenly and causing both patrons to hit the ground.
Action required

Australian Standard AS 2316.2.1:20161 refers to the design of zip lines. There are several other Australian Standards relating to lifting and rigging gear that provide information on design and testing. The principles in these standards can also be applied to zip lines.
All zip lines

All zip lines, including the zip line terminations and anchorage systems, should be designed or verified by a suitably qualified Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ). The engineer should verify all components of the zip line including the methods used to install the hardware. The engineer should provide written instructions on periodical inspection methods for the zip line along with any limitations on its use (e.g. loading, wind).

All connections should comply with recognised Australian or International Standards for lifting or climbing equipment. Connections should also comply with sound rigging practice. This includes setting up zip lines using:

thimbles on all steel wire rope terminations
load-rated and moused shackles (i.e. to prevent the pin coming loose)
load-rated chain that has been proof loaded before use
load-rated turnbuckles and connectors.

Hand spliced terminations should not be used for zip line terminations. Any termination where the termination manufacturer states that the termination is unsuitable for suspending people should not be used. Any conditions that a termination manufacturer states for the use of a termination should be complied with.

Zip lines are to be installed by workers who hold a high risk work licence in advanced rigging.

An assessment of all trees to which zip lines are attached should be made by a qualified arborist prior to commissioning and at intervals not exceeding 12 months.
Design loads

The zip line installation, including rope terminations and anchorages, should be designed for both:

a safety factor2 of at least 5 with respect to the maximum permissible suspended load on the zip line (i.e. people and associated gear that moves along the zip line).
a safety factor of at least 3 with respect to the maximum rope tension in the zip line cable (i.e. including the total combined load from pre-tension and maximum permissible suspended load).

Both the safety factors above are based on the zip line being able to withstand the factored loads without failure of any part of the system.
Test loads

Prior to its first use, a proof test load should be applied to the zip line in the same manner that the zip line is to be used. A minimum proof-test load of twice the rated capacity of a zip line is recommended. Two examples of how the test load is calculated and applied are shown in examples 1 and 2.

After the proof test and prior to use, the zip line installation should be inspected to check for damage and other irregularities, including slippage of rope terminations. Inspection should only be carried out by the engineer or workers with a high risk work licence in rigging, with guidance sought from the engineer.

Periodic load testing of every zip line, with a safety factor of 2, and post-test inspection, should be carried out at intervals as specified by the design engineer, but should not exceed 12 months, unless specifically justified by the engineer. People carrying out the load test and post-test inspection should be riggers or engineers.

Zip lines should receive a comprehensive inspection after high winds (specified by the engineer) or other severe weather events, especially where one or more of the end anchorages is on a tree. Tree inspections should be carried out by an arborist.
Worked examples – Calculation of proof test load
Example 1

The zip line has a rated capacity of one person and is based on the mass of the person, harness, trolley and connection hardware not exceeding 160 kg.

Proof test load = 2 x 160 kg = 320 kg suspended on one zip line trolley (refer Diagram 1).

Diagram 1

Diagram 1
Example 2

The zip line has a rated capacity of two people, one behind the other, and is based on maximum mass of each person, harness, trolley and connection hardware of 125 kg.

Proof test load = 2 x 125 = 250 kg per suspension point with 250 kg suspended from one zip line trolley and 250 suspended from the other trolley (refer Diagram 2).

Diagram 2

Diagram 2
Pressed ferrule rope terminations

Pressed ferrule rope terminations consist of a metal ferrule or sleeve that is pressed onto the two parts of a wire rope. The ferrules are usually attached using a fixed metal hydraulic swaging press or a cordless swaging device fitted with appropriate dies.

The design engineer is to consider potential corrosion of the rope termination which can be in the form of rust or galvanic corrosion by the combination of dissimilar metals. It is also important to monitor any die or tool wear so that the swaging pressure is not reduced.

If ferrules (swages) are fitted on site using a handheld powered tool, the tool should be a rope swaging tool approved by the manufacturer for the installation of wire rope terminations used for supporting people. The design engineer should specify the size and characteristics of the rope swage sleeves (e.g. material and type) and the swaging tool to be used. Cordless crimping tools, designed for joining electrical cable, should not be used to construct wire rope terminations.

Documented test results relating to the tensile strength of identical rope terminations should be available at the zip line facility. The test results should provide evidence of the minimum strength of the pressed ferrule rope terminations. The test results should relate to the same press (or swaging tool), dies, rope specifications and ferrule (swage sleeve) used on the zip lines at the facility. The test documentation can be in the form of tensile strength testing carried out on a test sample and should be preferably carried out by a third party.
Wire rope grips

Some zip lines being operated in Queensland use wire rope grips. Information on the safe use of wire rope grips is provided in Australian Standards, AS 2076-1996 Wire rope grips for non-lifting applications and AS 2759-2004 Steel wire rope – Use, operation and maintenance. AS 2076 states that wire rope grips “are not intended for the permanent fastening of a rope that is subject to high dynamic loading” (clause 10.2) and “shall not be used where the rope is required to support persons or suspended loads” (clause 10.3).

Reasons that AS 2076 specifies these restrictions on the use of wire rope grips may include the following:

Their effective use requires tightening to a specific torque.
To ensure ongoing safe operation, nuts will require re-tightening at least until the rope under the grip is stable under load (the rope diameter decreases under load).
‘Bulldog’ type wire rope grips (i.e. using a single saddle and U-bolt) will deform parts of the rope (usually the rope tail)3.
Even when installed correctly, wire rope grip terminations may have a significantly lower strength than the wire rope itself.

With regards to tightening to a specific torque, it is important that the appropriate wire rope grips for the cable are used, installed correctly and that they are not over-tightened or under-tightened. If under-tightened, the wire rope can slip through the rope grips and cause the zip line to pull out. If over-tightened, the threads on the rope grips can be stripped so that pressure on the rope is lost and the line pulls out. If over-tightened and threads are not stripped, the rope can be damaged so that premature failure of the rope could potentially occur. In addition, it should be noted that the wire rope grip furthest from the eye of the thimble should not be over-tightened as that position is the most vulnerable part of the termination assembly.

In view of installation difficulties associated with wire rope grips, the use of zip line terminations using wire rope grips on zip lines is not a preferred alternative and should be replaced with more reliable means of rope terminations as soon as practicable.

If a duty holder wishes to continue with the use of wire rope grips as an interim measure, a design engineer is to:

certify that the wire rope grips can safely withstand loadings with factors of safety of at least those specified in this document
provide detailed instructions on installation and inspection.

If wire rope grips are used as terminations, ensure:

a minimum and maximum tightening torque is specified by an RPEQ engineer certifying the integrity of the zip line installation. Guidance on the tightening torque should be obtained from the manufacturer of the wire rope grip. In its absence, information on the tightening torque is provided in AS 2076 – 1996
the installation guidance provided in AS 2076 is complied with
only a calibrated torque wrench is to be used
each nut on the wire rope grips is identified as being tightened to the correct torque (e.g. a durable colour-coded paint mark across the nut and saddle that relates to the rigger installing the wire rope grip)
the wire rope grips are re-tightened with a calibrated torque wrench at intervals specified by the engineer and re-marked
the zip line is proof tested with a test load of twice its rated capacity prior to use and at periodic intervals specified by the design engineer, but no greater than 12 months
measuring and marking the length of the rope tail protruding from the last bulldog grip, so that it will be easy to identify if slippage has occurred during testing.


1AS 2316.2.1:2016 Artificial climbing structures and challenge courses Part 2.1: Flying foxes and challenge ropes courses – Construction and safety requirements (EN 15567-1:2007, MOD)

2AS 1666.1:2009 Wire rope slings Part 1: Product specification specifies that single-leg wire rope lifting slings are to be manufactured with a safety factor of 5. Testing to five times working load limit (WLL) is a type test, after which the tested sling must be discarded. AS 1666.1 also specifies a proof test of two times the WLL for all new wire rope slings. While it is acknowledged that the way a zip line is loaded differs from a lifting sling, a design safety factor of 5 and proof testing with a safety factor of 2 are reasonable. AS 2316.2.1:2016 specifies a safety factor of 3 but this should be applied to the total combined loading on the zip line cable and not just to the suspended load.

3 Double-throat wire rope grips are another type of wire rope grip and are designed not to damage the rope. However, their effectiveness still requires tightening and re-tightening to a minimum torque.
Further information

Australian Adventure Activity Standard and associated Good Practice Guides
Australian Standard AS 1666.1:2009 Wire rope slings Part 1: Product specification
AS 2076-1996 Wire rope grips for non-lifting applications
AS 2316.2.1:2016 Artificial climbing structures and challenge courses Part 2.1: Flying foxes and challenge ropes courses – Construction and safety requirements (EN 15567-1:2007, MOD)
AS 2759-2004 Steel wire rope – Use, operation and maintenance

Australian Standards can be obtained by contacting Standards Australia. Australian Adventure Activity Standards are available at http://www.australianaas.org.au.

Last updated
09 December 2019
Walter Siebert
Beiträge: 398
Registriert: Fr Feb 08, 2008 3:05 pm
Wohnort: Wien

Zurück zu Unfallanalysen

Wer ist online?

Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 3 Gäste